man fucks woman :
subject, verb, object.

foolish-chronicles:

unadoptable:

idkdidkdidkidkd if i like this

gpoy gpoy gpoy gpoy

(via l-ucky)

(via grrrlstudies)

alexandrancaesarempirius:

alldanelle:

Wow. Powerful.

Oh I wish Americans would stop the arrogance that they display towards other nations

(via blck-grrl)

Gender isn’t simply a biological trait; it’s a societal one. The female experience is different from that of the male, and if, as a male writer, you cannot accept that basic premise, then you will never, ever, be able to write women well. A man walking alone through Midtown Manhattan at three in the morning may have concerns for his safety, but I promise you, it’s a very different experience for a woman taking the same walk, and it’s different again for a man wearing a dress. Think about it. That’s a societal factor, and it’s a gendered one, and this is not and can not be subject to debate. If you’re looking to argue that sexism is a thing of the past, that the world is gender-blind, you’re not only wrong, you’re lying to yourself.

atelophobiclife:ravenaedemorte:atelophobiclife:

It is wrong to protect one sex legally from having their genitals mutilated, yet routinely hack away at infants of another sex. Female genital mutilation is abhorrant - so is male genital mutilation. No person, regardless of sex, should have their genitals butchered against their will. When you circumcise a boy, you are forcibly amputating a healthy portion of his anatomy without his consent - you are violating his human rights to bodily integrity. 

If an adult male wishes to be circumcised, that’s his choice - but it needs to be his choice.  When you mutilate an infant, you are taking away their choice to their body, the same choices that you profess you should have. 

Children are not dolls. They are not your property to do with however you see fit. They are people - treat them as such.

Post seems to be ignoring the fact that it is some time done for religious reasons, regardless of the fact its to a child, its what is right to them and their religious expression in a way. Sure it’s unneccessary in some cases but i’m certain no mother is going to do that to their child if they don’t think its a good idea or useful in some way… Theres no mother that would willingly put her child in pain unless it was going to help!

RELIGION IS THE MOST HORRIBLE REASON TO MUTILATE ANYONE. GAH! Saying it’s okay to amputate someone’s foreskin because it’s your “religious express” is like saying it’s okay for people to behead others because honor killing is their expression. 

I bet you don’t feel the same way about mutilating a female’s genitals, even though THAT is done for religious reasons as well. Religion is NEVER an excuse to violate SOMEONE ELSE’S rights.

(via humanformat)

reaons why i shouldn’t go to work

(via haute-proportions)

cycleofmisery:

THERE WILL BE BLOOD - EMMA ARVIDA BYSTROM

(via grrrowling)